SQUID on tip sensors

SQUIDs

A Superconducting QUantum Interference Device (SQUID) is the most sensitive device for measuring magnetic field. The main part of the device consists of a superconducting loop with two Josephson junctions or weak links coupled to two electrical leads. Since the complex superconducting order parameter, ψ(r)=|ψ(r)|eiφ(r), has to be single valued, the phase of the order parameter should change by a multiple of 2π around the loop, resulting in quantization of the flux in the loop in units of flux quantum Φ0 = hc/2e = 20.7 [Gauss μm2]. As a result, the properties of the loop, including its critical current and the resistance, become periodic with magnetic field or more precisely with the flux in the loop. The typical flux sensitivity of a SQUID is 10-6 Φ0, allowing measurement of magnetic field with extremely high sensitivity. Because the field sensitivity improves with increasing the area of the loop, most of the SQUIDs are large. Decreasing the size of the loop decreases field sensitivity but improves spatial resolution and increases the sensitivity for detecting microscopic magnetic moments.
A SQUID is schematically described by a superconducting loop with two weak links.
The maximal current that can flow in the SQUID without dissipation is periodic in flux in the loop
 Ic(Φ) = I0|cos(π Φ/Φ0)|.

nanoSQUID on a tip

In recent years there is a growing interest in development of microSQUIDs for imaging and study of quantum magnetism. Imaging magnetic fields on a nanoscale is a major challenge in nanotechnology, physics, chemistry, and biology. One of the milestones in this endeavor is to achieve sensitivity sufficient for detection of the magnetic moment of a single electron. There are three main technological challenges: fabrication of a sensor with a high magnetic flux sensitivity, reducing the size of the sensor, and the ability to scan the sensor nanometers above the sample. Most of the current microSQUIDs are based on planar technology using lithographic or focused ion beam patterning methods. The large in-plane size of the planar devices, however, prevents bringing the SQUID loop into sufficiently close proximity to the sample (due to alignment issues) to scan it with optimal sensitivity. We have developed a very simple self-aligned fabrication method which results in the smallest SQUIDs to date. The layout of the nanoSQUID is simply set by the geometry of a pulled quartz tip with no lithographic steps and no processing involved. In addition, the major advantage is that this nanoSQUID resides on a very sharp tip that is ideally suited for scanning probe microscopy. Another significant advantage of the SQUID on tip is that it can operate at fields as high as 0.5 T. Finally, the fact that the I-V characteristics of the SQUID on tip can be made asymmetric allows high sensitivity operation of the SQUID essentially at any field by proper selection of the bias voltage and polarity. The following table presents figures of merit of an aluminum SQUID on tip with a diameter of 200 nm.
Flux sensitivity 2x10-6 Φ0/Hz1/2
Field sensitivity 10-7 T/Hz1/2
Spin sensitivity  65 μB/Hz1/2
Critical temperature, Tc
1.6 K
Maximum workable field 0.5 T
Junction critical current, Ic
1.6 μA
Junction critical current asymmetry [2] α 0.5
 βL = 2LI00  0.85
Loop inductance
550 pH

SQUID on tip fabrication

The sensor preparation is conceptually very simple. A quartz tube of 1 mm outside diameter is pulled to form a pair of sharp pipettes with tip diameter that can be controllably varied between 100 and 400 nm using a commercial pipette puller (a Sutter Instrument P-2000 in our case). Then, Au leads are deposited or Indium leads are painted on two sides of the cylindrical base of the pipette. Finally, the pipette is mounted on a rotator and put into a vacuum chamber for three "self-aligned" steps of thermal evaporation of Aluminum. In the first step, 25 nm of Al are deposited on the tip tilted at an angle of -100° with respect to the line to the source. Then the tip is rotated to an angle of 100°, followed by a second deposition of 25 nm. As a result, two leads on opposite sides of the quartz tube are formed. In the last step 17 nm of Al are evaporated at an angle of 0°, coating the apex ring of the tip. The resulting structure has two leads connected to a ring. "Strong" superconducting regions are formed in the areas where the leads make contact with the ring, while the two parts of the ring in the region of the gap between the leads constitute two weak links, thus forming the SQUID. The resulting nanoSQUID requires no lithographic processing, its size is controlled by a conventional pulling procedure of a quartz tube, and it is located at the apex of a sharp tip fit for scanning probe microscopy.


nanoSQUID on tip fabrication recipe

Measurement circuitry

SQUIDs are usually current biased and their voltage is measured. We apply voltage bias instead, using a low resistance bias resistor and measure the current of the SQUID on tip using low temperature series SQUID array current to voltage amplifier (SSAA) fabricated at NIST. This is a chip that consists of an array of a hundred SQUIDs in series that are inductively coupled to the current from the SQUID and operate in a closed feedback loop using an inductively coupled feedback coil. The noise level of the series SQUID array amplifier is few pA/Hz1/2.

The SQUID on tip measurement circuit. The current through the SQUID on tip is inductively coupled to an SSAA - a cryogenic current amplifier.

SQUID on tip characteristics

The I-V characteristics of SQUID on tip display several interesting features. First, the I-V characteristics show no hysteresis which is a significant advantage of our nanoSQUIDs and of the voltage bias setup, which avoids the need for complicated pulsed measurements. Second, a large negative differential resistance is present over a wide range of biases, which is consistent with the resistively shunted model of a Josephson junction taking into account our voltage bias circuit. Third, the SQUIDs on tip show large modulation of the critical current Ic with field that is required for a high field sensitivity. Finally, the I-V characteristics display fine structure at high biases which apparently results from some resonances.

Typical V-I curves at different applied fields showing negative differential resistance, large critical current modulation with applied field and resonances.
The typical V-I-H characteristics of our nanoSQUID on tip. The current through the tip is measured as a function of voltage bias and magnetic field and plotted in color scale.

SQUID-on-tip as a sample topography sensor

The main advantage of the SQUID-on-tip sensors is the ability to bring them very close to the sample and to scan within nanometers above the surface of a sample. In order to prevent crashing the tip and to maintain a constant height over the sample one needs a method for sensitive sensing of tip-sample distance and a feedback mechanism. We achieve this by gluing the tip to a quartz crystal oscillator in the shape of a tuning fork that is commonly used in quartz watches. When the tip is brought to within a few nanometers from sample it dampens the tuning fork resonance. The frequency shift or the reduction in amplitude of the resonance peak of the tuning fork is used as a feedback mechanism that drives a piezo device for maintaining a predefined tip-sample distance. Using this approach we integrated the SQUID on tip into a scanning probe microscope operating at 300 mK which provides a simultaneous imaging of sample topography and of the local magnetic field on the nanoscale.
SEM




A SEM image of the SQUID on tip and of a tip glued to one tine of a tuning fork.
An optical image of the  SQUID on tip glued to a tuning fork.

For additional information, see:

  1. Self-aligned nanoscale SQUID on a tip
    A. Finkler, Y. Segev, Y. Myasoedov, M. L. Rappaport, L. Ne'eman, D. Vasyukov, E. Zeldov, M. E. Huber, J. Martin and A. Yacoby
    Nano Letters 10, 1046 (2010)
  2. dc SQUID: Noise and optimization
    C. D. Tesche and J. Clarke
    J. Low Temp. Phys. 29, 301 (1977)
  3. A series array of DC SQUIDs
    R. P. Welty and J. M. Martinis
    IEEE Trans. Magn. 27, 2924 (1991)
  4. DC SQUID series array amplifiers with 120 MHz bandwidth
    M. E. Huber, P. A. Neil, R. G. Benson, D. A. Burns, A. F. Corey, C. S. Flynn, Y. Kitaygorodskaya, O. Massihzadeh, J. M. Martinis and G. C. Hilton
    IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 11, 4048 (2001)