![]() |
|
Members of my group |
Much of our work has centered on analysis of cooperativity in the GroE chaperonin system (for reviews see Horovitz et al., 2001; Horovitz and Willison, 2005). Steady-state and presteady-state kinetic data led us to propose several years ago a nested allosteric model for the GroEL double-ring (Yifrach and Horovitz, 1995). According to this model, each ring of GroEL is in equilibrium between a T state (with low affinity for ATP and high affinity for protein substrates) and an R state (with high affinity for ATP and low affinity for protein substrates), in accordance with the concerted Monod-Wyman-Changeux model. A second level of allostery is reflected in inter-ring negative cooperativity which is described by the sequential Koshland-Nemethy-Filmer model. The three allosteric states of GroEL in the presence of ATP, TT, TR and RR, have been visualized using cryo-EM (White et al., 1997). We are currently analysing the allosteric mechanism of CCT, the eukaryotic homologue of GroEL. Each ring of CCT is composed of 8 different subunits in contrast to the 7 identical subunits of GroEL rings. Steady-state kinetic data for CCT shows that it also undergoes two ATP-induced allosteric transitions which, in contrast to GroEL, are not concerted (Kafri et al., 2001; Rivenzon-Segal et al., 2005). Specific research questions we are addressing at the present time are:
1. What is the relationship between allostery in the GroE chaperonin system and its folding function? 2. What is the pathway(s) of the ATP-induced allosteric transitions of GroEL? |
![]() Cryo-EM images of the TT (left) and RR (right) allosteric states of GroEL at
30 Ċ resolution (Prof. H. Saibil, Birkbeck College).
|