All events, 2010

Cortical blood flow: Every (subsurface) vessel counts

Lecture
Date:
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Hour: 11:00
Location:
Gerhard M.J. Schmidt Lecture Hall
Prof. David Kleinfeld
|
Dept of Physics University of California at San Diego La Jolla, CA

Neuronal processing has a high energetic cost, all of which is supplied through brain vasculature. What are the design rules for this system? How is flow controlled by neuronal activity? How do neurons respond to failures in the vasculature? Theses questions will be addressed at the level of necortex in rat and mouse. An essential aspect of this work is the use of nonlinear optical tools to measure and perturb vasodynamics and automate the large-scale mapping of brain angioarchitecture.

The neurobiology of seizures and depression

Lecture
Date:
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Hour: 12:30
Location:
Jacob Ziskind Building
Dr. Oscar G. Morales
|
Associate Director, Psychiatric Neurotherapeutics Program (PNP) Harvard Medical School

Altered Function of the Prefrontal Cortex Following Extended Access to Self-Administered Cocaine

Lecture
Date:
Monday, November 8, 2010
Hour: 13:30
Location:
Nella and Leon Benoziyo Building for Brain Research
Dr. Osnat Ben-Shahar
|
Dept of Psychology University of California Santa Barbara

One main alteration in neural function observed in human cocaine addicts is reduced function in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). However, whether altered function of the mPFC precede, or result from, excessive self-administration of cocaine, and the exact neurochemical changes it consists of, is still unknown. To answer these questions, one needs an appropriate animal model of addiction. As, it is well established that differences in the route of, and control over, cocaine-administration, or in the frequency and size of the daily-dose of cocaine, result in significant differences in cocaine-induced neurochemical effects; then if we are to better understand the neuroadaptations that underlie the development of addiction in humans, we should employ animal models that mimic as closely as possible the human situation. Hence, my lab utilize an animal model that employs intravenous self-administration of cocaine, under conditions (based on Ahmed & Koob, 1998) that distinguish the effects of brief versus extended daily access to cocaine upon both behavior and neural substrates. This permits the investigation of neuroadaptations associated with the transition from the drug-naïve state to controlled drug-use, versus the further adaptations associated with the transition from controlled to compulsive drug-use. Using this model, we measured basal, as well as cocaine-induced, release of glutamate and dopamine within the mPFC during and after various levels of exposure to cocaine. The differences we found between controlled and compulsive drug-states, will be discussed in this talk.

HOW RHYTHMIC ACTIVITIES IN THE BRAIN MAKE YOU FEAR AND FORGET

Lecture
Date:
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Hour: 12:30
Location:
Jacob Ziskind Building
Prof. Hans-Christian Pape
|
Institute for Physiology I Westfälische Wilhelms University Münster, Germany

Fear is a crucial adaptive component of the behavioral repertoire that is generated in relation to stimuli which threaten to perturb homeostasis. Fear-relevant associations are learned and consolidated as part of long term memory. After learning, fear responses are modulated through processes termed safety learning and extinction. Perturbation of these mechanisms can lead to disproportional anxiety states and anxiety disorders. Recent years have seen considerable progress in identifying relevant brain areas – such as the amygdala, the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex - and neurophysiological principles. Key mechanisms, involving rhythmic oscillations of neuronal subpopulations and neuromodulatory influences, will be discussed

Individual differences in the expression and control of conditioned fear

Lecture
Date:
Sunday, August 15, 2010
Hour: 12:00
Location:
Nella and Leon Benoziyo Building for Brain Research
Catherine Hartley
|
Doctoral Student, New York University

In order to function adaptively in a complex environment, individuals must both react to environmental threats and modify their reactions as circumstances change. A large body of work employing Pavlovian conditioning paradigms has generated a detailed neuroscientific understanding of how fear responses are acquired. More recent research has begun to probe the various means by which learned fear can be diminished. The vast majority of this research focuses on the mechanisms that underlie typical responding in an idealized “average” individual. A robust model of fear learning must also account for the substantial variability in fear reactivity and regulation that exists between individuals. The experiments presented here explore neurobiological and experiential factors that are associated with individual variation in the expression and regulation of conditioned fear using psychophysiology, neuroimaging, and behavioral genetics.

Faces, Attention, and the Temporal Lobe

Lecture
Date:
Thursday, August 12, 2010
Hour: 11:00
Location:
Nella and Leon Benoziyo Building for Brain Research
Prof. Winrich Freiwald
|
The Rockefeller University, New York

Understanding the neural mechanisms of visual object recognition is a difficult task in part, because for any given object it is not clear, which exact part of the brain to study. Yet evolution has presented us with a unique model system to decipher these mechanisms. The temporal lobes of macaque monkeys contain neural machinery to support face recognition consisting of six discrete patches of face-selective cortex. The two main organizing features of this system – concentration of cells encoding the same complex object category into modules and spatial separation of modules – make it possible to break down the process of face recognition into its components. In my talk I will present anatomical results supporting the notion that the distributed face patches really are part of an integrated face-processing machine, and electrophysiological results showing that each patch subserves a distinct computational function. In the second part of my talk I will turn to something completely different, attention. Using fMRI in macaque monkeys, we found a network of areas to be modulated by attention in motion-discrimination task, included a hitherto unsuspected region within inferotemporal cortex, PITd. We then targeted PITd for electrophysiological recordings and electrical microstimulation in different tasks to learn about its role in sensory information processing and spatial attention. I will discuss the somewhat radical conclusion we arrived at, namely that PITd may constitute a region for attentional control.

Embraining the mind: On cerebral localization and the nature of culture

Lecture
Date:
Monday, August 9, 2010
Hour: 12:30
Location:
Arthur and Rochelle Belfer Building for Biomedical Research
Dr. Sky Gross
|
Dept of Sociology and Anthropology Tel Aviv University

Are we our brains? This question has troubled Western society for centuries, and still does today. Philosophers, psychologists, psychiatrists and neuroscientists - as much as the lay public - battle with the question of whether our personality, sense of self and states of mind can truly be explained through a scientific study of the brain, and whether one can at least correlate these with brain activity and structure. With the recent hyperbolic advances made in neuroscience, these questions arise in the form of intensive and broad debates on whether one may be able, at some point in the future, to fully account for what we cherish more than all, our sense that we are more than a lump of flesh. This "more" however, does not belong to the realm of science: in the laboratory, one must deal with observable and operalizationable phenomena – everything core subjectivity ('qualia'- e.g. the experience of pain, of seeing the color red) is not. How can neuroscience approach the mind without losing its brain? How well has it done thus far, and what may we expect in the future? This talk will suggest one – among many – approaches to this quandary, by looking at the history and current practices of brain localization. By introducing the mind-body conundrum into the study of this enterprise, we will consider the extent to which localization and classification of brain/mind functions serve as a way to materialize what is/was believed to be beyond 'matter'. The following debate will allow a discussion of an issue that concerns us all.

Translational Research in the Neuroscience of Fear Extinction: Implications to PTSD and Other Anxiety Disorders

Lecture
Date:
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Hour: 15:00
Location:
Nella and Leon Benoziyo Building for Brain Research
Prof. Mohammed Milad
|
Psychiatry Dept, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA

Some people adapt well in the aftermath of traumatic events and are quickly able to inhibit their fear responses to trauma-associated stimuli. Fear responses, however, persist for longer periods of time for others to the point where they reach a pathological state. Why are some people more resilient to trauma while others are not? What are the neural substrates that underlie fear inhibition and extinction? Are these circuits deficient in patients with anxiety disorders? In my talk, I will focus on presenting translational data from the rat and human brains with the objective of trying to provide some preliminary answers to the above stated questions. Specifically, I will review human studies indicating that prefrontal areas homologous to those critical for extinction in rats. Furthermore, I will present some data to show that those brain regions in the rat brain appear to be structurally and functionally homologous to specific brain regions in the human brain. I will also show some data suggesting that these brain regions, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), appear to be deficient in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). I will present some structural and functional neuroimaging and psychophysiological studies done in our lab that focused on the neural mechanisms of fear extinction, particularly extinction recall and the contextual modulation of extinction recall. These recent studies suggest that: 1) human vmPFC is involved in the recall of extinction memory; 2) the size of the vmPFC might explain individual differences in the ability to modulate fear among humans; 3) hippocampal activation is observed during the recall of extinction memory in a context where extinction training took place but not in the initial conditioning context; 4) and the dACC may be involved in the expression of fear responses. I will also present recent neuroimaging and psychophysiological data from PTSD patients suggesting that 1) the retention of extinction memory is impaired in PTSD, and 2) the function of the vmPFC and dACC (measured by fMRI) appears to be impaired in PTSD in the context of fear extinction. Implications of these findings to the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders such as PTSD and current extinction-based behavioral therapies for anxiety disorders will be discussed.

Active sensing in echolocating bats: What we know and what we would like to know

Lecture
Date:
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Hour: 12:30
Location:
Jacob Ziskind Building
Yossi Yovel
|
Postdoc, Ulanovsky Group, Dept of Neurobiology, WIS

All sensory systems are active to some extent. Echolocating bats, which rely on their own emitted energy to perceive the surroundings, probably employ the most tightly-controlled active sensing system. The sensory degrees of freedom that bats can control are commonly divided into three categories: Timing, Signal design, and Directionality. In this talk, I will address all three categories and will summarize what we already understand and what we would love to understand.

Estrogen Attenuates Ischemic Oxidative Damage via Inhibition of NADPH Oxidase Activation Role of Estrogen-Induced Neuroprotection:

Lecture
Date:
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Hour: 10:30
Location:
Nella and Leon Benoziyo Building for Brain Research
Limor Raz
|
Institute of Molecular Medicine & Genetics, Developmental Neurobiology Program, Dept of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA

17-β estradiol (E2) has been implicated to be neuroprotective, yet the mechanisms underlying E2-mediated protection against stroke remains unclear. The purpose of the current study was to elucidate the role of E2 in NADPH oxidase (NOX2) activation during ischemia/reperfusion induction of superoxide in the hippocampus CA1 region following global cerebral ischemia (GCI) and to explore the regulation of downstream proapoptotic factors by E2. Using a 4-vessel occlusion model to induce GCI, we showed that neuronal NOX2 localizes to the membrane and that NADPH oxidase activity and superoxide production were rapidly and markedly attenuated by E2 following reperfusion. Inhibition of NADPH oxidase activation via icv administration of a NOX2 competitive inhibitor, gp91ds-tat, strongly attenuated superoxide production and was neuroprotective. The increase of neuronal NADPH oxidase and superoxide following cerebral ischemia was shown to require Rac1 activation, as administration of a Rac1 inhibitor (NSC23766) significantly attenuated NADPH oxidase activation and superoxide production following stroke. NSC23766 treatment was also neuroprotective and improved spatial learning and memory. Interestingly, treatment with the competitive NOX2 inhibitor (Gp91ds-tat), but not the scrambled tat peptide control, attenuated acetylation of downstream p53 and reduced levels of the P53 transcriptional target and apoptotic factor, PUMA. Taken as a whole, our studies reveal a novel, membrane-mediated antioxidant mechanism of E2-induced neuroprotection via reduction of neuronal NOX2 activation, superoxide production and neuronal cell death in the hippocampus CA1 following cerebral ischemia.

Pages

All events, 2010

Cortical blood flow: Every (subsurface) vessel counts

Lecture
Date:
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Hour: 11:00
Location:
Gerhard M.J. Schmidt Lecture Hall
Prof. David Kleinfeld
|
Dept of Physics University of California at San Diego La Jolla, CA

Neuronal processing has a high energetic cost, all of which is supplied through brain vasculature. What are the design rules for this system? How is flow controlled by neuronal activity? How do neurons respond to failures in the vasculature? Theses questions will be addressed at the level of necortex in rat and mouse. An essential aspect of this work is the use of nonlinear optical tools to measure and perturb vasodynamics and automate the large-scale mapping of brain angioarchitecture.

The neurobiology of seizures and depression

Lecture
Date:
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Hour: 12:30
Location:
Jacob Ziskind Building
Dr. Oscar G. Morales
|
Associate Director, Psychiatric Neurotherapeutics Program (PNP) Harvard Medical School

Altered Function of the Prefrontal Cortex Following Extended Access to Self-Administered Cocaine

Lecture
Date:
Monday, November 8, 2010
Hour: 13:30
Location:
Nella and Leon Benoziyo Building for Brain Research
Dr. Osnat Ben-Shahar
|
Dept of Psychology University of California Santa Barbara

One main alteration in neural function observed in human cocaine addicts is reduced function in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). However, whether altered function of the mPFC precede, or result from, excessive self-administration of cocaine, and the exact neurochemical changes it consists of, is still unknown. To answer these questions, one needs an appropriate animal model of addiction. As, it is well established that differences in the route of, and control over, cocaine-administration, or in the frequency and size of the daily-dose of cocaine, result in significant differences in cocaine-induced neurochemical effects; then if we are to better understand the neuroadaptations that underlie the development of addiction in humans, we should employ animal models that mimic as closely as possible the human situation. Hence, my lab utilize an animal model that employs intravenous self-administration of cocaine, under conditions (based on Ahmed & Koob, 1998) that distinguish the effects of brief versus extended daily access to cocaine upon both behavior and neural substrates. This permits the investigation of neuroadaptations associated with the transition from the drug-naïve state to controlled drug-use, versus the further adaptations associated with the transition from controlled to compulsive drug-use. Using this model, we measured basal, as well as cocaine-induced, release of glutamate and dopamine within the mPFC during and after various levels of exposure to cocaine. The differences we found between controlled and compulsive drug-states, will be discussed in this talk.

HOW RHYTHMIC ACTIVITIES IN THE BRAIN MAKE YOU FEAR AND FORGET

Lecture
Date:
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Hour: 12:30
Location:
Jacob Ziskind Building
Prof. Hans-Christian Pape
|
Institute for Physiology I Westfälische Wilhelms University Münster, Germany

Fear is a crucial adaptive component of the behavioral repertoire that is generated in relation to stimuli which threaten to perturb homeostasis. Fear-relevant associations are learned and consolidated as part of long term memory. After learning, fear responses are modulated through processes termed safety learning and extinction. Perturbation of these mechanisms can lead to disproportional anxiety states and anxiety disorders. Recent years have seen considerable progress in identifying relevant brain areas – such as the amygdala, the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex - and neurophysiological principles. Key mechanisms, involving rhythmic oscillations of neuronal subpopulations and neuromodulatory influences, will be discussed

Individual differences in the expression and control of conditioned fear

Lecture
Date:
Sunday, August 15, 2010
Hour: 12:00
Location:
Nella and Leon Benoziyo Building for Brain Research
Catherine Hartley
|
Doctoral Student, New York University

In order to function adaptively in a complex environment, individuals must both react to environmental threats and modify their reactions as circumstances change. A large body of work employing Pavlovian conditioning paradigms has generated a detailed neuroscientific understanding of how fear responses are acquired. More recent research has begun to probe the various means by which learned fear can be diminished. The vast majority of this research focuses on the mechanisms that underlie typical responding in an idealized “average” individual. A robust model of fear learning must also account for the substantial variability in fear reactivity and regulation that exists between individuals. The experiments presented here explore neurobiological and experiential factors that are associated with individual variation in the expression and regulation of conditioned fear using psychophysiology, neuroimaging, and behavioral genetics.

Faces, Attention, and the Temporal Lobe

Lecture
Date:
Thursday, August 12, 2010
Hour: 11:00
Location:
Nella and Leon Benoziyo Building for Brain Research
Prof. Winrich Freiwald
|
The Rockefeller University, New York

Understanding the neural mechanisms of visual object recognition is a difficult task in part, because for any given object it is not clear, which exact part of the brain to study. Yet evolution has presented us with a unique model system to decipher these mechanisms. The temporal lobes of macaque monkeys contain neural machinery to support face recognition consisting of six discrete patches of face-selective cortex. The two main organizing features of this system – concentration of cells encoding the same complex object category into modules and spatial separation of modules – make it possible to break down the process of face recognition into its components. In my talk I will present anatomical results supporting the notion that the distributed face patches really are part of an integrated face-processing machine, and electrophysiological results showing that each patch subserves a distinct computational function. In the second part of my talk I will turn to something completely different, attention. Using fMRI in macaque monkeys, we found a network of areas to be modulated by attention in motion-discrimination task, included a hitherto unsuspected region within inferotemporal cortex, PITd. We then targeted PITd for electrophysiological recordings and electrical microstimulation in different tasks to learn about its role in sensory information processing and spatial attention. I will discuss the somewhat radical conclusion we arrived at, namely that PITd may constitute a region for attentional control.

Embraining the mind: On cerebral localization and the nature of culture

Lecture
Date:
Monday, August 9, 2010
Hour: 12:30
Location:
Arthur and Rochelle Belfer Building for Biomedical Research
Dr. Sky Gross
|
Dept of Sociology and Anthropology Tel Aviv University

Are we our brains? This question has troubled Western society for centuries, and still does today. Philosophers, psychologists, psychiatrists and neuroscientists - as much as the lay public - battle with the question of whether our personality, sense of self and states of mind can truly be explained through a scientific study of the brain, and whether one can at least correlate these with brain activity and structure. With the recent hyperbolic advances made in neuroscience, these questions arise in the form of intensive and broad debates on whether one may be able, at some point in the future, to fully account for what we cherish more than all, our sense that we are more than a lump of flesh. This "more" however, does not belong to the realm of science: in the laboratory, one must deal with observable and operalizationable phenomena – everything core subjectivity ('qualia'- e.g. the experience of pain, of seeing the color red) is not. How can neuroscience approach the mind without losing its brain? How well has it done thus far, and what may we expect in the future? This talk will suggest one – among many – approaches to this quandary, by looking at the history and current practices of brain localization. By introducing the mind-body conundrum into the study of this enterprise, we will consider the extent to which localization and classification of brain/mind functions serve as a way to materialize what is/was believed to be beyond 'matter'. The following debate will allow a discussion of an issue that concerns us all.

Translational Research in the Neuroscience of Fear Extinction: Implications to PTSD and Other Anxiety Disorders

Lecture
Date:
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Hour: 15:00
Location:
Nella and Leon Benoziyo Building for Brain Research
Prof. Mohammed Milad
|
Psychiatry Dept, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA

Some people adapt well in the aftermath of traumatic events and are quickly able to inhibit their fear responses to trauma-associated stimuli. Fear responses, however, persist for longer periods of time for others to the point where they reach a pathological state. Why are some people more resilient to trauma while others are not? What are the neural substrates that underlie fear inhibition and extinction? Are these circuits deficient in patients with anxiety disorders? In my talk, I will focus on presenting translational data from the rat and human brains with the objective of trying to provide some preliminary answers to the above stated questions. Specifically, I will review human studies indicating that prefrontal areas homologous to those critical for extinction in rats. Furthermore, I will present some data to show that those brain regions in the rat brain appear to be structurally and functionally homologous to specific brain regions in the human brain. I will also show some data suggesting that these brain regions, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), appear to be deficient in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). I will present some structural and functional neuroimaging and psychophysiological studies done in our lab that focused on the neural mechanisms of fear extinction, particularly extinction recall and the contextual modulation of extinction recall. These recent studies suggest that: 1) human vmPFC is involved in the recall of extinction memory; 2) the size of the vmPFC might explain individual differences in the ability to modulate fear among humans; 3) hippocampal activation is observed during the recall of extinction memory in a context where extinction training took place but not in the initial conditioning context; 4) and the dACC may be involved in the expression of fear responses. I will also present recent neuroimaging and psychophysiological data from PTSD patients suggesting that 1) the retention of extinction memory is impaired in PTSD, and 2) the function of the vmPFC and dACC (measured by fMRI) appears to be impaired in PTSD in the context of fear extinction. Implications of these findings to the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders such as PTSD and current extinction-based behavioral therapies for anxiety disorders will be discussed.

Active sensing in echolocating bats: What we know and what we would like to know

Lecture
Date:
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Hour: 12:30
Location:
Jacob Ziskind Building
Yossi Yovel
|
Postdoc, Ulanovsky Group, Dept of Neurobiology, WIS

All sensory systems are active to some extent. Echolocating bats, which rely on their own emitted energy to perceive the surroundings, probably employ the most tightly-controlled active sensing system. The sensory degrees of freedom that bats can control are commonly divided into three categories: Timing, Signal design, and Directionality. In this talk, I will address all three categories and will summarize what we already understand and what we would love to understand.

Estrogen Attenuates Ischemic Oxidative Damage via Inhibition of NADPH Oxidase Activation Role of Estrogen-Induced Neuroprotection:

Lecture
Date:
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Hour: 10:30
Location:
Nella and Leon Benoziyo Building for Brain Research
Limor Raz
|
Institute of Molecular Medicine & Genetics, Developmental Neurobiology Program, Dept of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA

17-β estradiol (E2) has been implicated to be neuroprotective, yet the mechanisms underlying E2-mediated protection against stroke remains unclear. The purpose of the current study was to elucidate the role of E2 in NADPH oxidase (NOX2) activation during ischemia/reperfusion induction of superoxide in the hippocampus CA1 region following global cerebral ischemia (GCI) and to explore the regulation of downstream proapoptotic factors by E2. Using a 4-vessel occlusion model to induce GCI, we showed that neuronal NOX2 localizes to the membrane and that NADPH oxidase activity and superoxide production were rapidly and markedly attenuated by E2 following reperfusion. Inhibition of NADPH oxidase activation via icv administration of a NOX2 competitive inhibitor, gp91ds-tat, strongly attenuated superoxide production and was neuroprotective. The increase of neuronal NADPH oxidase and superoxide following cerebral ischemia was shown to require Rac1 activation, as administration of a Rac1 inhibitor (NSC23766) significantly attenuated NADPH oxidase activation and superoxide production following stroke. NSC23766 treatment was also neuroprotective and improved spatial learning and memory. Interestingly, treatment with the competitive NOX2 inhibitor (Gp91ds-tat), but not the scrambled tat peptide control, attenuated acetylation of downstream p53 and reduced levels of the P53 transcriptional target and apoptotic factor, PUMA. Taken as a whole, our studies reveal a novel, membrane-mediated antioxidant mechanism of E2-induced neuroprotection via reduction of neuronal NOX2 activation, superoxide production and neuronal cell death in the hippocampus CA1 following cerebral ischemia.

Pages

All events, 2010

There are no events to display

All events, 2010

There are no events to display